From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 9, 2011
373 P.3d 934 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 56585.

05-09-2011

Terrance R. LANDRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada and Brian Williams, Respondents.

Terrance R. Landry Attorney General/Las Vegas


Terrance R. Landry

Attorney General/Las Vegas

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus . Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathy A. Hardcastle, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

Appellant's claim that pursuant to NRS 209.449(1) he was entitled to a credit of 60 days for completion of all programming lacks merit. The provisions of NRS 209.449(1) apply only to programs of “vocational education or training” or “other programs approved by the Director.” As the Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections pursuant to NRS 209.449 did not approve any of the programming contested by appellant, and appellant did not allege that the programming was vocational in nature, appellant is not entitled to the 60–day credit provided by that same section. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Landry v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 9, 2011
373 P.3d 934 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Landry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terrance R. LANDRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada and Brian Williams…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: May 9, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 934 (Nev. 2011)