From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landrum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug 28, 2012
375 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97725.

2012-08-28

Terrish LANDRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Dennis M. Schaumann, Judge. Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Dennis M. Schaumann, Judge.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Terrish Landrum appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Landrum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug 28, 2012
375 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Landrum v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terrish LANDRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

375 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)