From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landress v. Blohm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

April, 1919.


The right of a party to a negligence case to examine his adversary for the purpose of proving facts necessary to the examining party's affirmative case is undoubted. ( Preiss v. O'Donohue, 173 App. Div. 121; Kessler v. North River Realty Co., 169 id. 814.) Under the peculiar circumstances of this case such an examination seems not only proper but necessary. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Landress v. Blohm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Landress v. Blohm

Case Details

Full title:HARRY LANDRESS, an Infant, etc., by SAMUEL LANDRESS, His Guardian ad…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)