From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landmark at Hillsboro v. Candelora

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 10, 2005
No. 4D04-3878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D04-3878.

August 10, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Miette K. Burnstein, Judge, L.T. Case No. 03-13109 CACE21.

Jeffrey A. Mowers and Z. Suzanne Arbide of Pyszka, Blackmon, Levy, Mowers Kelley, Miami Lakes, for appellant.

Annette J. Szorosy of Weiss, Handler, Angelos Cornwell, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.


Landmark at Hillsboro Condominium Association ("Landmark") appeals a final order denying its motion for attorneys' fees and costs as the prevailing party under section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes. We affirm.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525, addressing the timeliness of motions for costs and attorney's fees, provides that "[a]ny party seeking a judgment taxing costs, attorneys' fees, or both shall serve a motion within 30 days after filing of the judgment, including a judgment of dismissal, or the service of a notice of voluntary dismissal." The purpose of rule 1.525 is to eliminate the reasonable time rule and establish a time requirement to serve motions for costs and attorney's fees. Carter v. Lake County, 840 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). In this case, because Landmark filed its fee motion forty-three days after the trial court entered the order dismissing the original complaint and forty-six days after Candelora filed its amended complaint dropping four counts against Landmark, the motion was untimely under rule 1.525 as a matter of law. See Green v. Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n, 730 So. 2d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 1998) ("Until a rule is approved for cases that are dismissed before the filing of an answer, we require that a defendant's claim for attorney fees is to be made either in the defendant's motion to dismiss or by a separate motion which must be filed within thirty days following a dismissal of the action. If the claim is not made within this time period, the claim is waived.").

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., and CROW, DAVID F., Associate Judge, concur.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Landmark at Hillsboro v. Candelora

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 10, 2005
No. 4D04-3878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2005)
Case details for

Landmark at Hillsboro v. Candelora

Case Details

Full title:LANDMARK AT HILLSBORO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 10, 2005

Citations

No. 4D04-3878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2005)