From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LandDesign, Inc. v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
Civil No. 3:10-0725 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:10-0725

05-10-2012

LANDDESIGN, INC. and LDSI, INC., Plaintiffs, v. LEWIS J. NORMAN, DAVID REED, and GIDEON VENTURES, LLC, Defendants.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Bryant


ORDER

On April 23, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 61), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs' Motion For Default Judgment against defendants Lewis J. Norman and Gideon Ventures, LLC is GRANTED, and the plaintiffs shall file appropriate affidavits and other evidence establishing the amount of their claim.

The court notes that the only remaining defendant in this case is defendant David Reed, who is pro se, and does not appear to have filed an Answer to the Complaint. The Magistrate Judge is requested to determine the status of the claims against defendant Reed, as this case is set for a bench trial on July 24, 2012.

It is so ORDERED.

___________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

LandDesign, Inc. v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 10, 2012
Civil No. 3:10-0725 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)
Case details for

LandDesign, Inc. v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:LANDDESIGN, INC. and LDSI, INC., Plaintiffs, v. LEWIS J. NORMAN, DAVID…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:10-0725 (M.D. Tenn. May. 10, 2012)