From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lance v. Tainter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1904
137 N.C. 249 (N.C. 1904)

Opinion

(Filed 17 December, 1904.)

1. Deeds — Acknowledgment — Husband and Wife — Notary Public.

A deed of trust acknowledged before the grantee named therein as notary public is void.

2. Deeds — Probate — Registration — Acknowledgment.

Where the acknowledgment of a deed is void, the registration thereof is also void.

3. Bankruptcy — Cancellation of Instruments — Cloud on Title — Deeds — The Code, sec. 1254.

A trustee in bankruptcy may maintain an action to cancel, as a cloud on title, a deed made by the bankrupt, which was void for defective acknowledgment, probate, and registration.

ACTION by N.J. Lance against A. C. Tainter and another, heard by Long, J., at January Term, 1904, of MADISON. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.

Gudger McElroy for plaintiff.

W. T. Crawford for defendant.


CONNOR, J., dissenting.


This is an action by the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of two bankrupts, to have canceled a deed in trust executed by them jointly, because it was acknowledged by both grantors and privy examination of their wives was taken before the trustee (250) named in said deed, who was a notary public. The trustee in the deed being an interested person, the acknowledgment and privy examination before him were absolutely void. Long v. Crews, 113 N.C. 256, and cases cited; 1 Devlin Deeds, secs. 476 and 477; 1 Cyc., 553, and notes.

The acknowledgment being a nullity, so was the probate by the clerk based thereon and the registration. Long v. Crews, supra; Barrett v. Barrett, 120 N.C. 129, 36 L.R.A., 326; Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N.C. 235; Robinson v. Willoughby, 70 N.C. 358; 1 Devlin, supra, 478.

The Code, sec. 1254, provides that "No deed of trust or mortgage for real or personal estate shall be valid at law to pass any property as against creditors or purchasers for a valuable consideration from the donor, bargainor, or mortgagor, but from the registration of such deeds of trust or mortgage in the county where the land lieth." The Bankrupt Law of 1898, sec. 67 a, provides that "Claims which, for want of record or for other reasons, would not have been valid liens as against the creditors of the bankrupt, shall not be liens against his estate." And section 70 e provides that "The trustee may avoid any transfer by the bankrupt of his property which any creditor of such bankrupt might have avoided, and may recover the property so transferred." It follows, therefore, that this instrument, not having been legally acknowledged, probated, nor registered, is invalid against the creditors of the bankrupt and should be canceled as a cloud upon the title which might injuriously affect the administration of the estate in the plaintiff's hands. The demurrer that the complaint did not state a cause of action was properly overruled.

No error.

CONNOR, J., dissents.

Cited: Allen v. Burch, 142 N.C. 527; Smith v. Lumber Co., 144 N.C. 48; Godwin v. Bank, 145 N.C. 330; Wood v. Lewey, 153 N.C. 402; Carriage Co. v. Dowd, 155 N.C. 316; Bank v. Redwine, 171 N.C. 571.

(251)


Summaries of

Lance v. Tainter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1904
137 N.C. 249 (N.C. 1904)
Case details for

Lance v. Tainter

Case Details

Full title:LANCE v. TAINTER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1904

Citations

137 N.C. 249 (N.C. 1904)
49 S.E. 211

Citing Cases

Wood v. Lewey

It turned out that the deed from said Alvatine was acknowledged in New Jersey, only before a commissioner of…

Smith v. Lumber Co.

1. Is the deed under which the defendant claims void because the acknowledgment of the grantor and privy…