From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lancaster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 27, 2007
959 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2D07-412.

June 27, 2007.

Lower Tribunal No. 2D07-412.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lancaster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 27, 2007
959 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Lancaster v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lancaster v. State

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

959 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)