From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Mkt. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1939
258 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

November 15, 1939.

Present — Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The construction of the regional market was a public improvement. ( Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. McMullen Co., 253 App. Div. 424; affd., 280 N.Y. 536.) The evidence shows that the Gray Steel Corporation entered into a contract with the general contractor for the construction of the regional market, in which the Gray Steel Corporation agreed to perform part of the contract of the general contractor. It also shows that the plaintiff entered into a contract with the Gray Steel Corporation for the performance of part of the latter's contract. Therefore, the plaintiff became a subcontractor. (Lien Law, § 2.) The contract referred to in the complaint and in the notice of lien was thereafter modified by oral agreement of the parties and the plaintiff performed work under such contract as modified and became entitled to a lien upon the moneys due for the construction of the regional market. The plaintiff has recovered in accordance with its complaint and its notice of lien. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff on the undisputed evidence was a materialman and not a subcontractor. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien upon public funds.)


Summaries of

Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Mkt. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1939
258 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Lamson Co. v. Central New York Regional Mkt. Auth

Case Details

Full title:THE LAMSON COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. CENTRAL NEW YORK REGIONAL MARKET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1939

Citations

258 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Wynkoop v. People

That seems the implied holding in Devitt v. Schottin ( 274 N.Y. 188, 194). The lienor in Lamson Co. v.…

Dorn v. Arthur A. Johnson Corp.

Generally, a subcontractor is regarded as one who assumes performance of some part of the contract, so that…