From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lammey v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-09972-JFW-ASx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-09972-JFW-ASx

12-18-2020

DWAIN LAMMEY, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Complaint Filed: November 29, 2018

Pursuant to the Court's Order (Dkt. 69) granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff Dwain Lammey's Motion for Summary Judgment, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff take nothing, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. DATED: December 18, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lammey v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-09972-JFW-ASx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Lammey v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DWAIN LAMMEY, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-09972-JFW-ASx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2020)

Citing Cases

Villegas v. Heavenly Mountain, LLC

Because Villegas's UCRA claims rise and fall with his ADA claims, his UCRA claims against Starbucks fail as…

Lammey v. Starbucks Corp.

Because Lammey's UCRA claim rises and falls with his ADA claim, his UCRA claim fails as well. See, e.g.,…