From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamkin v. Hartmeier

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 2024
SC 166864 (Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166864 COA 326986

07-02-2024

MARY ANN LAMKIN and STEVE LAMKIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EUGENE HARTMEIER, CYNTHIA HARTMEIER, KEVIN HARTMEIER, DENNIS McCOMB, GLORIA McCOMB, DANIEL ENGRAM, DANIELLE ENGRAM, JAMES BEAUDOIN, CECILE LAUDENSLAGER, ANGELA CHRISTIE, KIMBERLY KRASKA, JOAN BEAUDOIN, AARON KIRBY, DAMON HARTMEIER, DENISE ENGRAM, DEANN ENGRAM, DEREK ENGRAM, and CATHERINE BARRETT, Defendants-Appellees, and RONALD THYBAULT and the Estate of MARY WECKESER, Defendants.


Livingston CC: 12-026600-NZ

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2024 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Lamkin v. Hartmeier

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 2024
SC 166864 (Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Lamkin v. Hartmeier

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANN LAMKIN and STEVE LAMKIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EUGENE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

SC 166864 (Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)