From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. KPMG, LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 5, 2014
DOCKET NO. A-0997-13T9 (App. Div. Nov. 5, 2014)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-0997-13T9

11-05-2014

EDWARD LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KPMG, LLP, Defendant-Respondent.

Green, Savits & Lenzo, attorneys, and Justin M. Swartz, Paul W. Mollica, Rachel Bien and Deirdre Aaron (Outten & Golden) attorneys of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, for appellant (Glen Savits, Justin M. Swartz, Paul W. Mollica, Rachel Bien and Deirdre Aaron, of counsel and on the brief). Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC and Michael Kelley and Jennifer Altfeld Landau (Sidney Austin, LLP) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, Eamon P. Joyce (Sidney Austin, LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent (Domenick Carmagnola, Sean P. Joyce, Michael Kelley, Jennifer Altfeld Landau, and Eamon P. Joyce, of counsel and on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION Before Judges Ashrafi and Kennedy. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, L-5995-11. Green, Savits & Lenzo, attorneys, and Justin M. Swartz, Paul W. Mollica, Rachel Bien and Deirdre Aaron (Outten & Golden) attorneys of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, for appellant (Glen Savits, Justin M. Swartz, Paul W. Mollica, Rachel Bien and Deirdre Aaron, of counsel and on the brief). Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC and Michael Kelley and Jennifer Altfeld Landau (Sidney Austin, LLP) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, Eamon P. Joyce (Sidney Austin, LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent (Domenick Carmagnola, Sean P. Joyce, Michael Kelley, Jennifer Altfeld Landau, and Eamon P. Joyce, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

Lambert v. KPMG, LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 5, 2014
DOCKET NO. A-0997-13T9 (App. Div. Nov. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Lambert v. KPMG, LLP

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KPMG, LLP, Defendant-Respondent.

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-0997-13T9 (App. Div. Nov. 5, 2014)