From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamba v. Lamba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2003
308 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-04412

Argued June 16, 2003.

September 8, 2003.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated August 7, 1998, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), entered May 13, 2002, which directed that his pension plan be valued as of July 6, 1994.

Philip A. Greenberg, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Jaswant Lamba, Mineola, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly determined that the appropriate date for the valuation of the former husband's pension was July 6, 1994, the commencement date of the instant action, rather than the date of the commencement of an earlier discontinued divorce action ( see Fuegel v. Fuegel, 271 A.D.2d 404, 405; Nee v. Nee, 240 A.D.2d 478, 479; Marconi v. Marconi, 240 A.D.2d 641).

FLORIO, J.P., SCHMIDT, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lamba v. Lamba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 2003
308 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Lamba v. Lamba

Case Details

Full title:JASWANT LAMBA, respondent, v. MANMOHAN S. LAMBA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 360

Citing Cases

Tuccillo v. Tuccillo

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Trial courts have the discretion to…