From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 6, 2014
3:12-CV-01160-PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2014)

Opinion

3:12-CV-01160-PK

05-06-2014

CINDY LAMB, Plaintiff, v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

PAPAK, Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff Cindy Lamb brings this action against defendant Ace Cash Express, Inc. ("Ace"), her former employer, alleging that Ace violated Oregon law when it terminated her employment after she disclosed confidential customer information to law enforcement in the process of reporting possible child neglect.

On April 1, 2014, Ace requested via email that the court conduct an in camera inspection of Lamb's unredacted medical records to determine whether Lamb redacted the records in compliance with the court's instructions at the July 11, 2013 telephonic hearing. On May 1, 2014, Lamb provided the court with a copy of her unredacted medical records. After reviewing the unredacted medical records, I find that, consistent with my July 11, 2013 ruling, the following should be unredacted: (1) page 1, paragraph 6 under "A/P"; (2) page 2, last sentence of the third paragraph on the page; and (3) page 2, paragraph 4 under "assessment/plan."

CONCLUSION

In light of the foregoing, Lamb shall produce to Ace her medical records with the noted portions unredacted no later than May 9, 2014.

_______

Honorable Paul Papak

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Lamb v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 6, 2014
3:12-CV-01160-PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Lamb v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CINDY LAMB, Plaintiff, v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

3:12-CV-01160-PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2014)