From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamar v. Ishee

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Sep 18, 2006
Case No. 1:04-cv-541 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04-cv-541.

September 18, 2006


DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY


This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Conduct Additional Discovery (Doc. No. 130) which Respondent opposes (Doc. No. 132).

Without engaging in the fine-grained analysis of the state of Petitioner's Brady claim(s) to which Respondent has invited the Court, the Petitioner's Motion will be granted on what Respondent's counsel refers to as a "no harm to Respondent" basis (See Doc. No. 132 at 2). Petitioner may depose Lieutenant Howard Hudson of the Ohio Highway Patrol on the existence vel non of additional prisoner statements. Said deposition shall be taken not later than October 15, 2006. The time within which Petitioner shall file any motion for evidentiary hearing is extended, sua sponte, to and including November 1, 2006.


Summaries of

Lamar v. Ishee

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Sep 18, 2006
Case No. 1:04-cv-541 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Lamar v. Ishee

Case Details

Full title:KEITH LAMAR, Petitioner, v. TODD ISHEE, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:04-cv-541 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 18, 2006)