Opinion
No. 409 WAL 2019
04-06-2020
LAMAR ADVANTAGE GP COMPANY, LLC, Respondents v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and City of Pittsburgh, Petitioners
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW , this 6th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED , LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the holding of the panel in this matter that a static vinyl advertising sign could replace an electronic advertising sign was inconsistent with the holding in Lamar Advertising Co. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of the Municipality of Monroeville , 939 A.2d 994 (Pa.Commw. Ct. 2007) that static vinyl advertising signs and electronic advertising signs are so different that one cannot simply replace the other without application for and issuance of a new zoning and building permit?