From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lakin v. Barbara Rund & St. Hugo of the Hills Catholic Church

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 3, 2016
499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151367. COA No. 323695.

02-03-2016

Sanford N. LAKIN and Cecilia J. Lakin, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Barbara RUND and St. Hugo of the Hills Catholic Church, Defendants–Appellants, and Anthony Tocco, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider (1) whether publication of an allegedly false and defamatory statement imputing to another conduct constituting the criminal offense of battery is actionable irrespective of special harm, see e.g., Mains v. Whiting, 87 Mich. 172, 180, 49 N.W. 559 (1891); Taylor v. Kneeland, 1 Doug 67, 72 (1843) (holding that words charging a person with a crime are not actionable per se unless the crime involves moral turpitude or would subject the person to an infamous punishment); and (2) whether the statement at issue in this case imputed to the plaintiff the criminal offense of battery.


Summaries of

Lakin v. Barbara Rund & St. Hugo of the Hills Catholic Church

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 3, 2016
499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Lakin v. Barbara Rund & St. Hugo of the Hills Catholic Church

Case Details

Full title:Sanford N. LAKIN and Cecilia J. Lakin, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Barbara…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 590

Citing Cases

Lakin v. Rund

This Court denied defendants' application for leave to appeal. Our Supreme Court, on defendants' further…

Lakin v. Rund

This Court denied defendants' application for leave to appeal. Our Supreme Court, on defendants' further…