From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lakin v. Rund

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 3, 2016
SC: 151367 (Mich. Feb. 3, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 151367

02-03-2016

SANFORD N. LAKIN and CECILIA J. LAKIN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARBARA RUND and ST. HUGO OF THE HILLS CATHOLIC CHURCH, Defendants-Appellants, and ANTHONY TOCCO, Defendant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 323695
Oakland CC: 2014-138683-NO

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider (1) whether publication of an allegedly false and defamatory statement imputing to another conduct constituting the criminal offense of battery is actionable irrespective of special harm, see e.g., Mains v Whiting, 87 Mich 172, 180 (1891); Taylor v Kneeland, 1 Doug 67, 72 (1843) (holding that words charging a person with a crime are not actionable per se unless the crime involves moral turpitude or would subject the person to an infamous punishment); and (2) whether the statement at issue in this case imputed to the plaintiff the criminal offense of battery.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 3, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Lakin v. Rund

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 3, 2016
SC: 151367 (Mich. Feb. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Lakin v. Rund

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD N. LAKIN and CECILIA J. LAKIN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARBARA…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

SC: 151367 (Mich. Feb. 3, 2016)