From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lainez v. Baltazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 8, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00167-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00167-BR

06-08-2012

Rumualdo Lainez and Marvin Rivas Maldonado, Plaintiffs, v. Francisco Baltazar, Jr., Defendant.


DEFAULT

Upon motion, request, and proper showing by counsel for Plaintiffs in the above captioned action for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the above-named Defendant Francisco Baltazar, Jr., having failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend, default is hereby entered against the Francisco Baltazar, Jr.

________________________

JULE A. RICHARDS, CLERK


Summaries of

Lainez v. Baltazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 8, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00167-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Lainez v. Baltazar

Case Details

Full title:Rumualdo Lainez and Marvin Rivas Maldonado, Plaintiffs, v. Francisco…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00167-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2012)