From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LAIL v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 1975
314 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1364.

June 13, 1975. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Vaughn J. Rudnick, J.

Charles W. Musgrove, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Defendant being in gross violation of Rule 3.200, F.R.Cr.P., and there being no good cause displayed to support a court waiver of its requirements, it is our view that the trial court correctly administered the Rule within the allowable limits of his discretion in excluding defendant's alibi witness. Chester v. State, 276 So.2d 76 (2d DCA Fla. 1973). See Williams v. State, 264 So.2d 106 (4th DCA Fla. 1972).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and GRIDLEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

LAIL v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 1975
314 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

LAIL v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. LAIL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 8, 1975

Citations

314 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. State

In our view the inquiry made was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Richardson v. State, supra, and…

Garcia v. State

Affirmed. See Loftin v. State, 273 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1973); State v. Rucker, 330 So.2d 470 (Fla. 1976); Chester…