L.A.H. v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Reed v. State

    208 So. 3d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that an erroneous jury instruction was harmless because the State barely mentioned the instruction during closing arguments, and the defense rebutted it with counter evidence during its closing

    In any event, the absence of evidence on his manner of entry militates in Reed's favor. See L.A.H. v. State , 197 So.3d 1265, 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("The State presented no evidence as to how L.A.H. entered the car and thus presented no evidence that the entry was stealthy.").Ultimately, the circumstances of this case indicate that Reed made no effort to conceal himself to enter the apartment and did not appear to care whether he was discovered.