From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lagos v. Fucale

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 18, 2016
139 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2015-03155, Index No. 56915/12.

05-18-2016

Jose R. LAGOS, appellant, v. Patsy S. FUCALE, et al., respondents.

Omrani & Taub, P.C., New York, NY (Forde & Associates, P.C. [James L. Forde ], of counsel), for appellant. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, White Plains, NY (Robert Spolzino, Wayne I. Rabinowitz, and Micah I. Friedberg of counsel), for respondents.


Omrani & Taub, P.C., New York, NY (Forde & Associates, P.C. [James L. Forde ], of counsel), for appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, White Plains, NY (Robert Spolzino, Wayne I. Rabinowitz, and Micah I. Friedberg of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), dated March 11, 2015, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of damages as contrary to the weight of the evidence or in the interest of justice and for a new trial.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's contention that the defendants' trial counsel made various improper comments during the course of the damages trial is unpreserved for appellate review because the plaintiff either failed to object to these comments at trial (see Jean–Louis v. City of New York, 86 A.D.3d 628, 629, 928 N.Y.S.2d 310 ; Lucian v. Schwartz, 55 A.D.3d 687, 689, 865 N.Y.S.2d 643 ; Murray v. Weisenfeld, 37 A.D.3d 432, 434, 829 N.Y.S.2d 592 ; Friedman v. Marcus, 32 A.D.3d 820, 820, 821 N.Y.S.2d 136 ), or did not seek further curative instructions and did not immediately move for a mistrial (see Jean–Louis v. City of New York, 86 A.D.3d at 629, 928 N.Y.S.2d 310 ; Vingo v. Rosner, 29 A.D.3d 896, 897, 816 N.Y.S.2d 517 ; Bacigalupo v. Healthshield, Inc., 231 A.D.2d 538, 539, 647 N.Y.S.2d 32 ; Torrado v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 198 A.D.2d 346, 347, 603 N.Y.S.2d 325 ).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit. LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lagos v. Fucale

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 18, 2016
139 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Lagos v. Fucale

Case Details

Full title:Jose R. LAGOS, appellant, v. Patsy S. FUCALE, et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 18, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3854
30 N.Y.S.3d 573

Citing Cases

Masmalaj v. N.Y.C. Econ. Dev. Corp.

The defendants’ contention that the Supreme Court exhibited bias against them during the damages trial is…

Masmalaj v. N.Y. City Econ. Dev. Corp.

The defendants' contention that the Supreme Court exhibited bias against them during the damages trial is…