From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lafreniere v. Regents of University of Cal.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 24, 2006
172 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 21, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Zakariah Lafreniere, Berkeley, CA, pro se.

Michael Bruno, Alyson Cabrera, Esq., Gordon & Rees, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant--Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-04973-MJJ.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record, the response to the court's November 21, 2005 order to show cause and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Page 137.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lafreniere v. Regents of University of Cal.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 24, 2006
172 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Lafreniere v. Regents of University of Cal.

Case Details

Full title:Zakariah LAFRENIERE, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 2006

Citations

172 F. App'x 136 (9th Cir. 2006)