From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaFontaine v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 13, 2011
1:10-cv-00527-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

1:10-cv-00527-JAW

10-13-2011

FRED ERNEST LaFONTAINE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 25, 2011, the Recommended Decision is accepted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

LaFontaine v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 13, 2011
1:10-cv-00527-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

LaFontaine v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:FRED ERNEST LaFONTAINE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

1:10-cv-00527-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Soto v. Colvin

In general, Dr. Pease's records do appear to be internally inconsistent, as the administrative law judge…

Snowdon v. Colvin

The mere fact that the administrative law judge did not mention a GAF of 40 assigned to the plaintiff upon…