From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laffoon v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 27, 1950
111 F. Supp. 960 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

November 27, 1950.

Nathan Baker, New York City, for plaintiff.

Gay Behrens, New York City, for defendant.


On motion to dismiss.

See also 101 F. Supp. 823.


Motion granted as to the first cause of action. Seaworthiness is peculiarly and exclusively the obligation of the owner of the vessel. Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85, 100, 66 S.Ct. 872, 90 L.Ed. 1099.

Motion denied as to the second cause of action. Cf. Weade v. Dichmann, Wright Pugh, Inc., 337 U.S. 801, 808, 809, 69 S.Ct. 1326, 93 L.Ed. 1704; Greer v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., 1949 A.M.C. 1825.


Summaries of

Laffoon v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 27, 1950
111 F. Supp. 960 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Laffoon v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Clinton LAFFOON, Plaintiff, v. WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP., a corporation…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1950

Citations

111 F. Supp. 960 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Citing Cases

Laffoon v. Waterman S.S. Corp.

Libelant took no appeal from the final decree. The first cause of action in the suit at bar based upon the…