From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacey v. Yates

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 6, 2022
4:21-CV-00914-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-CV-00914-LPR

09-06-2022

ADRIAN LACEY PETITIONER v. JOHN P. YATES, Warden, FCI Forrest City Medium RESPONDENT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After a careful and de novo review of the Findings and Recommendations, as well as the record, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lacey v. Yates

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 6, 2022
4:21-CV-00914-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Lacey v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN LACEY PETITIONER v. JOHN P. YATES, Warden, FCI Forrest City Medium…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

4:21-CV-00914-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)