From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacava v. Merced Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-00853 LJO SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-00853 LJO SAB

02-27-2013

CINDY LACAVA, Plaintiff, v. MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

This cause came on regularly for trial on February 12, 2013 in Courtroom 4. A jury of eight (8) persons was regularly impaneled and sworn to try the action. Witnesses on the part of both Plaintiff and Defendant were sworn and examined between February 13, 2013 and February 20, 2013. After hearing the evidence, the arguments of counsel, and instructions of the Court, the jury retired to consider their verdict. The jury returned to Court on February 21, 2013, and being called, duly rendered their Special Verdict in writing in favor of Plaintiff Cindy LaCava and against Defendant Merced Irrigation District. (See Doc. 158.)

WHEREFORE, BY VIRTUE OF THE LAW, AND BY REASON OF THE PREMISES AFORESAID, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Cindy LaCava shall recover the sum of Four Hundred Fifty Three Thousand Dollars ($453,000.00) from Defendant Merced Irrigation District, and such recoverable costs, disbursements and fees as this Court may approve pursuant to a timely filed bill of costs and/or attorney's fee motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lacava v. Merced Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cv-00853 LJO SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Lacava v. Merced Irrigation Dist.

Case Details

Full title:CINDY LACAVA, Plaintiff, v. MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-00853 LJO SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)