From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacastro v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76281.

May 9, 2000.

APPEAL FROM: CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. LUCY D. RAUCH, JUDGE.

Raymund Jared Capelovitch, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Dominic Lacastro, ("defendant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. A jury previously convicted defendant of one count of felony driving while intoxicated in violation of section 577.010, RSMo 1994, and one count of misdemeanor driving without an operator's license in violation of section 302.340, RSMo 1994. These convictions were affirmed inState v. Lacastro, 967 S.W.2d 317 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Lacastro v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Lacastro v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC LACASTRO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 9, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)