From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Labrecque v. Reilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mar 30, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-503-JD (D.N.H. Mar. 30, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-cv-503-JD

03-30-2015

Robert Labrecque v. Edward Reilly, Warden, Northern New Hampshire Correctional Facility

cc: Robert Labrecque, pro se


ORDER

Robert Labrecque has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1), challenging his state court conviction and sentence on the basis that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial. The matter is before the court for preliminary review. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases ("§ 2254 Rules"); LR 4.3(d)(4)(A).

Labrecque challenges his conviction and incarceration pursuant to a state court judgment. As such, this action is arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and is so construed for all purposes.

Background

In his petition, Labrecque alleges that he was convicted of aggravated felonious sexual assault, incest, and endangering the welfare of a child in November 2009 and sentenced to, among other things, a lengthy prison term which he is presently serving. Labrecque has not stated whether, when, or on what grounds, he litigated a direct appeal of his conviction in the New Hampshire Supreme Court ("NHSC").

In December 2013, Labrecque filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the state Superior Court in which he argued that his trial counsel had failed to provide him with the effective assistance of counsel. The Superior Court denied Labrecque's petition. Labrecque appealed the denial of his state habeas petition to the NHSC. The NHSC declined the appeal on October 23, 2014. This action followed.

Without comment on whether the claims herein have been properly exhausted, or the timeliness of the petition, the court finds that the petition may proceed at this time without prejudice to the respondent's ability to move to dismiss the petition on any proper basis. Accordingly, the court directs service of the petition on the respondent, as described below, pursuant to § 2254 Rules 4 and 5.

Conclusion

The Clerk is directed to serve the New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General, as provided in the Agreement on Acceptance of Service: electronic copies of this Order and the Petition (doc. no. 1). Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the Petition within thirty days of service by the Clerk. The answer shall comply with § 2254 Rule 5. This matter will thereafter proceed in accordance with LR 7.4.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Andrea K. Johnstone

United States Magistrate Judge
March 30, 2015 cc: Robert Labrecque, pro se


Summaries of

Labrecque v. Reilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mar 30, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-503-JD (D.N.H. Mar. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Labrecque v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:Robert Labrecque v. Edward Reilly, Warden, Northern New Hampshire…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Mar 30, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14-cv-503-JD (D.N.H. Mar. 30, 2015)