Opinion
20 Civ. 5161 (PAE)
07-07-2020
ORDER
:
On July 6, 2020, plaintiff filed the complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. On review, it appears to the Court that plaintiff and one defendant each are a limited liability company ("LLC"). "[W]hen the citizenship of an LLC or LP is in question, a district court may not proceed to the merits without first determining whether it has subject-matter jurisdiction." Platinum-Montaur Life Scis., LLC v. Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., 943 F.3d 613, 619 (2d Cir. 2019); see also Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) ("[S]ubject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine qua non for the exercise of federal judicial power."). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P'ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); see also DigitAlb, Sh.a v. Setplex, LLC, 284 F. Supp. 3d 547, 560 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) ("[T]his Court cannot determine the citizenship of [defendant LLC] because the Complaint does not set forth the citizenship of [its] members.").
Accordingly, to ensure that there is a basis for diversity jurisdiction, the Court directs counsel to amend the complaint or to file a letter that lists the citizenship of each of plaintiff's and the LLC defendant's members, by July 24, 2020.
SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
Paul A. Engelmayer
United States District Judge Dated: July 7, 2020
New York, New York