From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. ex rel. Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Ltd. v. Wynn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-509-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-509-JCM (GWF)

03-05-2013

LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively and on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Limited, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN A. WYNN, et al., Defendants, and WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, a Nevada corporation, Nominal Defendant.

John P. Aldrich, Bar No. 6877 ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD. Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP Joseph P. Guglielmo Donald A. Broggi SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP Anne L. Box Walter W. Noss John Jasnoch C OHEN Christopher Lometti Richard Speirs Daniel B. Rehns C OHEN Daniel S. Sommers Elizabeth Aniskevich R OBBINS Brian J. Robbins Felipe J. Arroyo Shane P. Sanders Gina Stassi Plaintiffs' Executive Committee and KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK LLP Robin Winchester Counsel for Maryanne Solak P ISANELLI James J. Pisanelli, Bar No. 4027 Todd L. Bice, Bar No. 4534 Debra L. Spinelli, Bar No. 9695 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Paul K. Rowe ( pro hac vice admitted ) Bradley R. Wilson ( pro hac vice admitted ) Grant R. Mainland ( pro hac vice admitted ) WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN & KATZ Robert L. Shapiro ( pro hac vice admitted ) GLASER WEILL FINK JACOBS HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO, LLP Attorneys for Defendants Linda Chen, Ray R. Irani, Russell Goldsmith, Robert J. Miller, John A. Moran, Marc D. Schorr, Alvin V. Shoemaker, D. Boone Wayson, and Allan Zeman Donald J. Campbell, Bar No. 1216 J. Colby Williams, Bar No. 5549 Attorneys for Defendant Stephen A. Wynn MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP Ronald L. Olson ( pro hac vice admitted ) Mark B. Helm ( pro hac vice admitted ) Jeffrey Y. Wu ( pro hac vice admitted ) William R. Urga, Bar No. 1195 JOLLEY URGA WIRTH WOODBURY & STANDISH Attorneys for Defendant Elaine P. Wynn FENNEMORE CRAIG JONES VARGAS Gary R. Goodheart, Esq., Bar No. 1203 Karl L. Nielson, Esq., Bar No. 5082 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Limited


John P. Aldrich, Esq. (SBN #6877)
ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.
1601 S. Rainbow Blvd., SUITE 160
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: (702) 853-5490
Facsimile: (702) 227-1975
jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com
SCOTT+SCOTT LLP
Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice)
Donald A. Broggi (pro hac vice)
500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10110
Telephone: (212) 223-6444
Facsimile: (212) 223-6334
jguglielmo@scott-scott.COM
dbroggi@scott-scott.COM
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page.]

STIPULATION AND

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE MOTION

TO AMEND DERIVATIVE

COMPLAINT AND SET BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, on August 6, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint;

WHEREAS, on February 1, 2013, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Derivative Complaint and directing Plaintiffs to file a Motion to Amend pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 annexing their Proposed Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint within thirty days from the date of that Order;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 and Proposed Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint are currently due on March 4, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, have agreed to (1) extend Plaintiffs' time for filing their Motion to Amend by fourteen (14) days and, in the event the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend, (2) establish a briefing schedule for Defendants' Motions to Dismiss the Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint;

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, subject to Court approval, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Motion to Amend pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 and Proposed Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint no later than March 18, 2013.

2. In the event the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend, Defendants shall have 45 days to move or answer with respect to the Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint;

3. Plaintiffs' Opposition will be filed 45 days from the filing of Defendants' Motion(s);

4. Defendants' Replies will be filed 30 days from the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition(s); and

5. Defendants reserve the right to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: ____________________

John P. Aldrich, Bar No. 6877

ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

and

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

Joseph P. Guglielmo

Donald A. Broggi

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

Anne L. Box

Walter W. Noss

John Jasnoch

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC

Christopher Lometti

Richard Speirs

Daniel B. Rehns

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC

Daniel S. Sommers

Elizabeth Aniskevich

ROBBINS UMEDA LLP

Brian J. Robbins

Felipe J. Arroyo

Shane P. Sanders

Gina Stassi

Plaintiffs' Executive Committee

and

KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK LLP

Robin Winchester

Counsel for Maryanne Solak

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

By: ____________________

James J. Pisanelli, Bar No. 4027

Todd L. Bice, Bar No. 4534

Debra L. Spinelli, Bar No. 9695

Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

and

Paul K. Rowe (pro hac vice admitted)

Bradley R. Wilson (pro hac vice admitted)

Grant R. Mainland (pro hac vice admitted)

WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN & KATZ

and

Robert L. Shapiro (pro hac vice admitted)

GLASER WEILL FINK JACOBS HOWARD

AVCHEN & SHAPIRO, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Linda Chen, Ray R. Irani,

Russell Goldsmith, Robert J. Miller, John A. Moran,

Marc D. Schorr, Alvin V. Shoemaker, D. Boone

Wayson, and Allan Zeman

CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS

By: ____________________

Donald J. Campbell, Bar No. 1216

J. Colby Williams, Bar No. 5549

Attorneys for Defendant Stephen A. Wynn

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP

By: ____________________

Ronald L. Olson (pro hac vice admitted)

Mark B. Helm (pro hac vice admitted)

Jeffrey Y. Wu (pro hac vice admitted)

and

William R. Urga, Bar No. 1195

JOLLEY URGA WIRTH WOODBURY & STANDISH

Attorneys for Defendant Elaine P. Wynn

FENNEMORE CRAIG JONES VARGAS

By: ____________________

Gary R. Goodheart, Esq., Bar No. 1203

Karl L. Nielson, Esq., Bar No. 5082

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Limited

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00509-JCM-(GWF)


Summaries of

La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. ex rel. Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Ltd. v. Wynn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-509-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

La. Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. ex rel. Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts, Ltd. v. Wynn

Case Details

Full title:LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-509-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2013)