From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Corte v. County of Union

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 424 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Submitted February 11, 1938 —

Decided September 16, 1938.

Deductions made by the board of freeholders from the statutory salary of a District Court judge, under chapter 17, laws of 1933, as amended by chapter 446, laws of 1933, held proper following Vander Burgh v. County of Bergen, 120 N.J.L. 444.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the plaintiff-respondent, Frank J. Burns and Salvatore F. La Corte, pro se.

For the defendant-appellant, Clarence A. Ward.


Plaintiff sued to recover deductions withheld from his statutory salary as judge of the First Judicial District Court of the county of Union from February 1st, 1933, to April 30th, 1934. Defendant's answer was stricken upon the ground that it did not present a meritorious defense; and judgment for plaintiff was summarily entered. Defendant appeals.

The deductions during the year 1933 were in accordance with a consent signed by plaintiff. The deductions thereafter were in accordance with a resolution passed by the board of chosen freeholders under the purported authority of chapter 17, Pamph. L. 1933, as amended by chapter 446, Pamph. L. 1933, and under circumstances comparable to those recited in our opinion in the case of LeRoy Vander Burgh v. County of Bergen, reported in 120 N.J.L. 444. The determination herein is controlled by the decision in the cited case.

The judgment below will be reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 16.


Summaries of

La Corte v. County of Union

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 424 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

La Corte v. County of Union

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE F. LA CORTE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COUNTY OF UNION…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 16, 1938

Citations

1 A.2d 424 (N.J. 1938)
1 A.2d 424

Citing Cases

Erwin v. Hudson County

We may, with propriety, observe at this point that albeit, the resolutions of the Board of Freeholders…

Cross v. Bergen County

No objection, however, is raised to that procedure. We conclude that the defenses set up in the answer were…