From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurth v. Kurth

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 22, 1989
539 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1734.

February 22, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Woodrow Melvin, J.

J. Paul Fitzgerald of Clay Fitzgerald, P.A., Milton, for appellant.

Damian M. Ozark of Conley Cleary, Bradenton, for appellee.


Appellant filed a dissolution action in Santa Rosa County and thereafter sought to voluntarily dismiss the action. The trial court, on motion by appellee, entered the order on appeal, striking appellant's voluntary dismissal and changing venue of the action from Santa Rosa County to Manatee County.

Appellant's notice of voluntary dismissal was filed after service of appellee's counterclaim and therefore the trial court had jurisdiction to strike the notice of voluntary dismissal and change venue of the action. Rule 1.420(a)(2), Fla.R.Civ.P.; Siler v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 420 So.2d 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); McFarley v. McFarley, 353 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1978); and Cooper v. Cooper, 194 So.2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). Appellant's contention that by operation of rules 1.080(b) and 1.090(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, she had five days from service of appellee's counterclaim to take a voluntary dismissal lacks logic and legal precedent.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kurth v. Kurth

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 22, 1989
539 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kurth v. Kurth

Case Details

Full title:MARY FRANCIS KURTH, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM EDWARD KURTH, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 22, 1989

Citations

539 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)