From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurrikoff v. Town of Hamburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 30, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendants Town of Hamburg and the County of Erie. Plaintiffs failed to show facts sufficient to require a trial on any issue of fact in opposing the Town's and County's motions for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [b]).

The court erred, however, in granting defendant Frontier Central School District's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have raised questions of fact concerning both the slippery condition in the foyer and the School District's constructive notice of the condition, based upon the permanent placement of the mat near the doorway.


Summaries of

Kurrikoff v. Town of Hamburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Kurrikoff v. Town of Hamburg

Case Details

Full title:OIE KURRIKOFF et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF HAMBURG et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)