Opinion
May, 1917.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that it was error to admit evidence of paralysis under the allegations of the complaint.
May, 1917.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that it was error to admit evidence of paralysis under the allegations of the complaint.
Full title:PETER KURAK, Respondent, v. PETER TRAICHE, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1917