From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KUNZ v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 5, 1958
310 S.W.2d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Opinion

No. 29502.

January 29, 1958. On Motion to Reinstate Appeal March 5, 1958.

Appeal from the County Court, Donley County, Jack E. Gray, J.

Guy Hardin, Shamrock, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is fatally defective in that it does not appear to have been approved by either the county judge or the sheriff as required by Art. 830, Vernon's Ann. Code of Criminal Procedure. Brown v. State, 95 Tex.Crim. 568, 255 S.W. 438 and Lee v. State, 144 Tex.Crim. R., 162 S.W.2d 409.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The record has now been perfected, and the case will be considered on its merits.

In view of our disposition hereof, a recitation of the facts will not be deemed necessary.

The vital issue in the case was whether the appellant knew that the bottle of whiskey which was found by the officers behind the seat in his pickup was in the truck or whether it had been placed there by his friend Miller without his knowledge as testified by the appellant and Miller.

The State was permitted on cross-examination to ask the appellant if, while in jail, he had not had a telephone conversation with another friend in which he asked him to take the "stuff" out from behind the seat of his pickup before the brought it to the jail.

It has been the consistent holding of this Court under Article 727, V.A.C.C.P., that statements made while under arrest, not coming under the requirements of an oral confession and not a part of the res gestae, are not admissible. See Womack v. State, 160 Tex.Crim. R., 268 S.W.2d 140, and annotations appearing under Note 7, Article 727, supra.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

KUNZ v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 5, 1958
310 S.W.2d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
Case details for

KUNZ v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:Pete KUNZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 5, 1958

Citations

310 S.W.2d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
166 Tex. Crim. 14

Citing Cases

Cantu v. State

This is a conviction for the transportation of beer in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of…