From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kumer v. Passafiume

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 22, 1999

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Driscoll, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion is granted, and the judgment is vacated.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendants for the relief demanded in the complaint by submitting a "Statement for Judgment" to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which stated, inter alia, that the defendants had failed to appear or answer the complaint dated February 25, 1997. The defendants then moved for leave to vacate the judgment, and annexed to their motion papers an affidavit of service of the answer dated March 17, 1997.

Since the defendants submitted evidence that they did in fact serve an answer in a timely manner, the defendants did not default in any respect, and the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to vacate the default judgment. Under the circumstances, the defendants were not required to offer an excuse for the purported default and a meritorious defense ( see, Uy v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 247 A.D.2d 607).

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kumer v. Passafiume

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kumer v. Passafiume

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN KUMER, Respondent, v. RUDOLPH PASSAFIUME et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

Pelaez v. Westchester Medical Center

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the failure to be notified of the conference was fatal to…

Pavlou v. Assocs. Food Stores, Inc.

The plaintiffs demonstrated that they did not have notice of the trial calendar call of the action through…