From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2021
21-CV-8265 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-8265 (LTS)

11-15-2021

KUM NAM LEE, Plaintiff, v. PROLAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated October 12, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fee. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2021
21-CV-8265 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:KUM NAM LEE, Plaintiff, v. PROLAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 15, 2021

Citations

21-CV-8265 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)