- Search with
- Parallel SearchEnter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
- or
- Keyword SearchEnter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
- ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
- ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
- NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
- """due diligence"Exact match
- ()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
- *withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
- !infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
- /ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
- /sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
- /padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph
K.S. v. H.S
18 So. 3d 417 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)4 Citing cases
Ex Parte L.E.O
61 So. 3d 1042 (Ala. 2010) Cited 100 timesHolding that a child is ‘in need of care or supervision’ within the meaning of Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-102 a., when the child is not ‘receiving adequate care and supervision from those persons legally obligated to care for and/or to supervise the child’
`A juvenile court has jurisdiction in proceedings involving a child who is alleged to be dependent, § 12-15-30(a), Ala. Code 1975, and in custody proceedings when the child is "otherwise before the court." § 12-15-30(b)(1), Ala. Code 1975.' K.S. v. H.S., 18 So.3d 417, 418 (Ala.Civ.App. 2009). "The paternal grandmother properly invoked the dependency jurisdiction of the juvenile court when she filed her petition in January 2008.
Ex parte M.M.T.
148 So. 3d 728 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014) Cited 8 timesHolding that juvenile court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over petition that sought determination of a custody dispute
net of Tuscaloosa, Inc. v. Morton, 12 So.3d 1197, 1199 (Ala.2009).”K.S. v. H.S., 18 So.3d 417, 418 (Ala.Civ.App.2009).The father's February 21, 2013, petition for emergency custody alleged that the mother had abandoned the child, which is an allegation supporting a finding of dependency regarding the child.
K.C.G. v. S.J.R
46 So. 3d 499 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010) Cited 34 timesHolding that a juvenile court's judgment awarding custody of a child to a nonparent after electing to treat a dependency petition as a custody dispute was void
See Ex parte K.L.P., 868 So.2d 454, 456 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003). "A juvenile court has jurisdiction in proceedings involving a child who is alleged to be dependent, § 12-15-30(a), Ala. Code 1975, and in custody proceedings when the child is `otherwise before the court.' § 12-15-30(b)(1), Ala. Code 1975."K.S. v. H.S., 18 So.3d 417, 418 (Ala.Civ.App. 2009). Effective January 1, 2009, Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-30, was amended and renumbered as Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-114.
K.W.N. v. H.G.T
30 So. 3d 437 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)"A juvenile court has jurisdiction in proceedings involving a child who is alleged to be dependent, § 12-15-30(a), Ala. Code 1975, and in custody proceedings when the child is `otherwise before the court.' § 12-15-30(b)(1), Ala. Code 1975." K.S. v. H.S., 18 So.3d 417, 418 (Ala.Civ. App. 2009). Although dependency petitions with "JU" case designations had been filed concerning K.M., the juvenile court did not modify custody of K.M. in the context of those proceedings; instead, it modified custody of K.M. in the context of a custody-modification proceeding in case no. CS-07-138. See, e.g., T.B., ___ So.3d at ___.