Kruskal v. Diner

Full title: KERRY KRUSKAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAOS DINER, Defendant-Appellee.

Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Oct 13, 2021

No. A-1-CA-39414 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 13, 2021)

Opinion

A-1-CA-39414

10-13-2021

KERRY KRUSKAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAOS DINER, Defendant-Appellee.

Kerry Kruskal Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant Taos Diner El Prado, NM Pro Se Appellee

MEAGAN P. DUFFY, JUDGE

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Emilio J. Chavez, District Judge

Kerry Kruskal Arroyo Seco, NM Pro Se Appellant

Taos Diner El Prado, NM Pro Se Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MEAGAN P. DUFFY, JUDGE

{¶1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{¶2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge, JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge