From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 18, 2009
No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Jul. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM.

July 18, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Judicial Notice/Motion to Compel (Doc. 171). In her Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asks the Court to compel Defendants to submit their Initial Disclosure Statements. Plaintiff indicates that she served her Initial Disclosure Statement to Defendants on July 14, 2009. However, defense counsel has indicated that they are waiting for their respective motions to dismiss to be addressed by the Court before serving their Initial Disclosure Statements. Plaintiff subsequently filed her Notice of Initial Disclosure with the Court (Doc. 173).

The Court will deny Plaintiff's motion at this time. There are two motions to dismiss still pending, one filed by Defendants Perverted Justice Foundation (Doc. 147) and Xavier Von Erck, and another filed by Defendant Christopher Brochious (Doc. 141). Once these motions are resolved by the Court, a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference will be held. In the Court's Order setting the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, the Court will specify when Initial Disclosure Statements must be filed.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's Judicial Notice/Motion to Compel (Doc. 171).


Summaries of

Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jul 18, 2009
No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Jul. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:JAN E. KRUSKA, Plaintiff, v. PERVERTED JUSTICE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 18, 2009

Citations

No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Jul. 18, 2009)