From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krupa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jun 7, 1989
775 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 757-88.

April 26, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1989.

Appeal from 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Joe M. Joiner, J.

David K. Wilson, Sherman, for appellant.

Stephen Davidchik, Co. Atty. Jonathan H. Kamras, Asst. Co. Atty., Sherman, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted by a jury for criminal mischief and assessed 5 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed. Krupa v. State, 750 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising three grounds for review.

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983).

With this understanding, appellant's petition for discretionary review is refused.

TEAGUE, J., would grant, and MILLER, J., would grant grounds 2 and 3.


Summaries of

Krupa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jun 7, 1989
775 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)
Case details for

Krupa v. State

Case Details

Full title:George KRUPA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Jun 7, 1989

Citations

775 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

H.R.A., Matter of

It is clear to us that the appellate court did not mean to mandate that a State's petition lacking the…