From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kruger v. Hartsfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1220-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1220-G (BH)

12-18-2017

ZIV KRUGER, Plaintiff, v. LINDY HARTSFIELD, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

The motion of Mike Hartsfield to dismiss, filed May 26, 2017 (docket entry 12), and the joinder of Blood & Thunder Sports, Inc. to motion of Mike Hartsfield to dismiss, filed June 7, 2017 (docket entry 16), are GRANTED, and Mike Hartsfield's alternative motion to dismiss for improper venue is DENIED as moot. By separate judgment, all of plaintiffs' claims against defendants Mike Hartsfield and Blood & Thunder Sports, Inc., will be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED. December 18, 2017.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kruger v. Hartsfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1220-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Kruger v. Hartsfield

Case Details

Full title:ZIV KRUGER, Plaintiff, v. LINDY HARTSFIELD, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 18, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1220-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2017)