From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krug v. Pellicane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2015
No. CV 12-10696-PA(CW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)

Opinion

No. CV 12-10696-PA(CW)

01-08-2015

GREGORY C. KRUG, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PELLICANE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered (1) granting Defendant's motion to dismiss (docket no. 31, filed May 15, 2014); and (2) dismissing the action, with prejudice, for failure to date a claim. DATED: January 8, 2015

/s/_________

PERCY ANDERSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Krug v. Pellicane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2015
No. CV 12-10696-PA(CW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Krug v. Pellicane

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. KRUG, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PELLICANE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

No. CV 12-10696-PA(CW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Krug v. Maltinksy

Krug v. Toh, No. 15-cv-06691, *3 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2015). The Krug court also listed the cases filed by…