From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krueger v. Krueger

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 3, 2016
NO. 02-16-00268-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-16-00268-CV

11-03-2016

LELAND TRAVIS KRUEGER APPELLANT v. LARISSA MELANIE KRUEGER APPELLEE


FROM THE 442ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-60925-393 MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

On October 11, 2016, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: November 3, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Krueger v. Krueger

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 3, 2016
NO. 02-16-00268-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Krueger v. Krueger

Case Details

Full title:LELAND TRAVIS KRUEGER APPELLANT v. LARISSA MELANIE KRUEGER APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Nov 3, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-16-00268-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)