From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krouskoff v. Cameo House Owners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 17, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County for entry of a judgment declaring that the defendants did not violate the proprietary lease of Cameo House Owners, Inc.

The plaintiffs contend that the defendants violated the terms of the proprietary, lease of the defendant cooperative corporation. We conclude that the defendants made out, a prima facie case for summary judgment in their favor and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to their claims. Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment was properly granted ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 563).

We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the Supreme Court should have directed the entry of a declaration in favor of the defendants rather than dismissal of the complaint ( see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).

Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krouskoff v. Cameo House Owners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Krouskoff v. Cameo House Owners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN KROUSKOFF et al., Appellants, v. CAMEO HOUSE OWNERS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 907