From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kronenberger v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 13, 1944
324 Ill. App. 519 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,883. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 13, 1944 Released for publication January 4, 1945

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 138when plaintiff, whose automobile was in rear-end collision with defendant's truck, was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. In action for personal injuries, sustained by plaintiff when, in daytime, his automobile was in rear-end collision with defendant's truck, which, in violation of city ordinance, was parked double but which was thus parked for purpose of making delivery, held that, under evidence, plaintiff was negligent, as matter of law, in driving too close to automobile which he was following, and that his negligence contributed to cause of accident (Chicago Municipal Code, ch. 27, § 19, subpar. 12).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. M.L. McKINLEY, Judge, presiding. Judgment reversed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1943.

James A. Dooley, for appellant.

Barney L. Hollowick, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 13, 1944; released for publication January 4, 1945.


Summaries of

Kronenberger v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 13, 1944
324 Ill. App. 519 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Kronenberger v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas Kronenberger, Appellee, v. Coca Cola Bottling Company of Chicago…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 13, 1944

Citations

324 Ill. App. 519 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
58 N.E.2d 334

Citing Cases

Ceeder v. Kowach

The fact that his car skidded into plaintiff's car, even though the pavement was wet, leaves room for no…

Welsh v. Pritchett

For that reason, they furnish no guide lines for this case. The other contention of the defendant is that the…