From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krieg v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 28, 2010
Civ. No. 08-1505-CL (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 08-1505-CL.

December 28, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude that the R and R is correct.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#33) is adopted. The petition (#2) is denied and this action is dismissed. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27 day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Krieg v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 28, 2010
Civ. No. 08-1505-CL (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2010)
Case details for

Krieg v. Belleque

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILLIAM KRIEG, Petitioner, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 28, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 08-1505-CL (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2010)