From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krenwinkel v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2020
Case No. LA CV 19-10066-VBF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 19-10066-VBF (SP)

11-30-2020

PATRICIA KRENWINKEL, Petitioner, v. MOLLY HILL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. // // // // // //

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

Petitioner Krenwinkel's objection [Doc #14] is OVERRULED.

The respondent's Motion to Dismiss [Doc #10] is GRANTED.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED.

Final Judgment consistent with this Order and with the Report and Recommendation will be entered as a separate document per Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).

The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order as well.

This action is TERMINATED (JS-6). DATED: November 30, 2020

/s/ Valerie Baker Fairbank

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

Senior UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Krenwinkel v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2020
Case No. LA CV 19-10066-VBF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Krenwinkel v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA KRENWINKEL, Petitioner, v. MOLLY HILL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

Case No. LA CV 19-10066-VBF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2020)