Opinion
3:23-cv-01164-AR
05-05-2024
RICHARD KREFTING, Plaintiff, v. KAYE-SMITH ENTERPRISES, INC, and BOEING EMPLOYEE CREDIT UNION, Defendants.
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 2, 2024, in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of [His Individual] Claims Against Boeing Employees' Credit Union (“BECU”) with prejudice, grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of all his claims without prejudice, dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's individual claims against BECU, dismiss without prejudice all of Plaintiff's other claims, and deny all other pending motions as moot. F&R, ECF 96. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Armistead's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 96. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of [His Individual] Claims Against BECU with prejudice, ECF 92; GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of all his claims without prejudice, ECF 85; DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's individual claims against BECU, DISMISSES without prejudice all of Plaintiff's other claims, and DENIES all other pending motions as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.