From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krauss v. Iliescu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1999
259 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 1, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced the instant action on November 5, 1997. His second and third causes of action sought the imposition of a constructive trust based on acts which the defendants' decedent, Louis Schoenberg, allegedly committed between 1978 and March 1992. The court granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss as time-barred the plaintiffs second and third causes of action to the extent that they related to acts which occurred prior to November 5, 1991. We affirm.

"The equitable claim for the imposition of a constructive trust is governed by the six-year Statute of Limitations of CPLR 213 (1) * * * which starts to run upon the occurrence of the wrongful act giving rise to a duty of restitution" ( Sitkowski v. Petzing, 175 A.D.2d 801, 802; see, Matter of Wallace; 191 A.D.2d 638, 639; Matter of Sakow, 219 A.D.2d 479, 482). Thus, the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs second and third causes of action are time-barred to the extent that they seek to impose a constructive trust for acts which occurred prior to November 5, 1991.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krauss v. Iliescu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1999
259 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Krauss v. Iliescu

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KRAUSS, Appellant, v. VIOREL ILIESCU et al., Respondents. (And…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 78

Citing Cases

Pate v. Pate

The plaintiff's cause of action to impose a constructive trust is governed by the six-year statute of…

Nicolais v. Nicolais

To the extent argued and briefed by defendant, the Court finds that this action is timely, having been…